Caribbean MLSReal Estate

0.23 Acre Home Site for Sale, Signature One, Grand Cayman

Available on request

The brief

The reason to consider it.

A 0.23-acre home site is available for sale in Grand Cayman, located within the thoughtfully planned Signature One community in the tranquil East End. This plot is ideal for a custom residence in one of the island’s most promising emerging neighborhoods.

Signature One is a modern residential community featuring underground utilities and a 10-acre lake. Resort-style amenities are planned, including a clubhouse, fitness center, swimming pool, and tennis court.

The site is situated in the Frank Sound corridor, offering convenient access to beaches, the Queen Elizabeth II Botanic Park, and a variety of dining and lifestyle options. It provides a quieter alternative to the Seven Mile Beach corridor, appealing to buyers who value space, tranquility, and long-term value.

This lot presents an opportunity for those planning to build their dream home or seeking to invest in a developing residential area with genuine long-term upside.

Last confirmed

Type
Land
Land
10,010 ft²
Zoning
residential
Topography
flat
Subdivision approved
Yes
Electricity
Yes
Internet
Yes
Permitted uses
Single family

What this listing includes

  • Pool
  • Fitness centre
  • Tennis court

What people say about Cayman Islands

Sources agree that buying in Grand Cayman is tax-light but not cheap to live with.

  • Concern Cayman is among the most expensive places to live; imports and housing drive it
  • Positive No annual property, capital gains or inheritance tax; one-time stamp duty is the main purchase cost (7.5%, 10% above CI$2m from 2026)
  • Mixed Permanent residency by property needs CI$2m of developed real estate and is quota-limited; a cheaper 25-year certificate carries no right to work
  • Mixed Strata fees are a material carrying cost, higher on Seven Mile Beach

Read what people say, based on 9 sources

Cost of entry

The asking price is not what it costs.

What completing costs

US dollars

Who bears the transfer cost is market practice, not law