Caribbean MLSReal Estate

0.36-acre beachfront land in Colliers Beach, East End, Grand Cayman

Available on request

The brief

The reason to consider it.

0.36 acres (1,477 square meters) of beachfront land for sale in Grand Cayman located on Colliers Beach in tranquil East End. Versatile Beachfront Parcel in Colliers Offering privacy, tranquility and direct access to the Caribbean Sea, this lot on Colliers Beach in East End is perfect whether you’re looking for a site for a luxury home or an investment property. Spanning 0.36 acres (1,477 square meters), the lot has 114 feet of direct ocean frontage and 112 feet of road frontage on Austin Conolly Drive. Its Hotel/Tourism zoning makes it suitable for a luxury private residence or a boutique development. The lot is part of a larger beachfront offering along Colliers Beach, surrounded by the natural beauty of the Colliers area. A Substantial Piece of Coastline in East End With its ocean frontage, versatile zoning and peaceful surroundings, this lot is an excellent option for buyers exploring land for sale in East End, whether you’re planning a private residence on the beach or a boutique hospitality project.

Type
Land
Land
15,898 ft²
Zoning
Hotel/Tourism
Road frontage
112 m

What this listing includes

  • Beachfront
  • Beach access
  • Ocean view

What people say about Cayman Islands

Sources agree that buying in Grand Cayman is tax-light but not cheap to live with.

  • Concern Cayman is among the most expensive places to live; imports and housing drive it
  • Positive No annual property, capital gains or inheritance tax; one-time stamp duty is the main purchase cost (7.5%, 10% above CI$2m from 2026)
  • Mixed Permanent residency by property needs CI$2m of developed real estate and is quota-limited; a cheaper 25-year certificate carries no right to work
  • Mixed Strata fees are a material carrying cost, higher on Seven Mile Beach

Read what people say, based on 9 sources

Cost of entry

The asking price is not what it costs.

What completing costs

US dollars

Who bears the transfer cost is market practice, not law